![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
September 8, 2006 Dear Tomato Grower: In the current Tomato Bulletin:
2006 Harvest
Update (through PTAB’s Sep 9 Estimate): Crop still trails 7 yr average by almost 1,400,000, but has improved to 83% from 76% two weeks ago. |
|
Crop Conditions: Crop conditions are deteriorating as impact of July heat wave is being felt.
The CTGA and CASS 10,000,000 ton estimate is beginning to look like a stretch. Revised CASS extimate for 2006 crop: CASS surveyed the industry August 15 and revised their crop estimate from 11.4 million to 10.0 million tons – a 12.3% reduction. The reduction was largely expected since no one believed the 11.4 million figure in the first place. In addition, acreage was dropped from 288,000 to 279,000; which calculates to 35.8 tons/acre. Based on grower and processor feedback on yields to date, I wonder whether 279,000 acres were actually planted. Revised World Processing Tomato Council Estimate (‘000 MT): Sep Est. June Est. Change Worldwide 29,050 31,971 (9.2%) Italy 4,000 4,800 (16.7%) China 4,000 3,500 (12.5%) Iran 2,100 1,950 (7.2%) Spain 1,750 1,580 (9.8%) Worldwide consumption estimated at 32,500,000 vs. 29,050,000 production will result in 3,450,000 drawdown in inventories. Tomato prices will increase worldwide in 2007. Garlic Prices to Increase Sharply in 2007: Growers on the Westside were able to negotiate a sharp increase for 2007 garlic. A major processor initially offered $160 which is a 12.6% increase over the $142 paid in 2006, but growers said they needed a minimum of $200. The processor then offered $170, but they still had no takers. Finally after processors reviewed available acreage and projections for alternative crops they reluctantly agreed to pay $190 plus $75/acre for sprinkling; a 37% increase. Another processor increased their sliding scale contract from $164 to $200 and matched the $75 /acre for sprinkling; a 24% increase. Why is this relevant?
Processors confident that they don’t need to pay anything near $65 for ‘07: Processor feedback from our August 28 Tomato Bulletin when we stated that growers wanted a minimum of $65 varied. A brief summary is below with editorial comments in parenthesis: · It’s too early to talk about ‘07 since only 50% of ‘06 has been harvested (Every day that passes growers lose leverage) · If ’06 is below 9,500,000, $65 could be in the cards otherwise it’s too much (Carryout inventories will be at historic lows whether the crop is 9.5 or 10 million) · Growers will happily sell as many acres as they can at $60, so why pay more? (This argument is reminiscent to last year’s “Tomatoes will be planted in sidewalk cracks if the price is above $55”…) · A $65 price is irresponsible, will force widespread imports and ruin a good thing. (Forget the import risk for ’07 and ruin what good thing? Who’s happy with financial returns in this business?) · Higher late season premiums are a joke. Processors have just as much late season risk as growers. (Processor risk is spread across the entire season whereas the majority of late season growers have a high percentage or all their tonnage late. Yield risk and higher costs are well documented) · Growers are out of their freakin’ minds. (Just like almond growers…) All kidding aside, if growers want a price above current levels they need to follow these simple steps:
Next CTGA Grower Meeting:
Questions or comments, please call (209) 478-1761. Ross Siragusa President/CEO |
|
|
|
| Tomato Bulletins | Press Releases | Editorials | Archives | |